FOR TENDER SOFTWARE TEAMS

Route the bid exception.
Keep the tender moving.

When analysis finds a risk or threshold, get the right decision before qualification or scoring reaches it.

One decision, with context — or nothing at all.
TENDER REVIEW23 documents · 428 pagesQualification, risk, clarifications and evidence
Analysing
NowStep 3 of 5
DECISION FOUND

Analysis continues while you decide
ONE DECISION PER RUN

Five moments where one answer keeps work moving.

Each card loads a separate simulated workflow stage. The full decision appears above with the context needed to answer it.

One decision. Then you’re done. If nothing can move the work forward, WIT stays quiet.
THE SECOND PAYOFF: GOVERNED DECISION MEMORY

The answer helps this run. Approved patterns can improve the next.

Separate one-off strategy from commercial rules the team confirms and wants to reuse.

01
Current workflowThe answer is immediately written back to workflow state, so the later stage does not have to stop and ask again.
02
Reusable rule candidateA liability cap or margin gate that is repeatedly confirmed can become a suggested team rule. A one-off strategic choice stays attached to that tender.
03
Router learningAnswered, skipped and overridden questions improve the ranking. Low-value interruptions naturally disappear.
04
No silent professional autopilotCase-specific judgment stays case-specific. Reusable defaults are proposed and confirmed instead of silently inferred.
THE PRODUCT QUESTION

Why wait until the agent stops to resolve a risk it has already found?

Keep the core agent running.
Ask one answerable, consequential decision.
Return the answer before the review gate needs it.
If nothing can move the work forward, stay quiet.
ONE WORKFLOW IS ENOUGH TO TEST IT

Show us where your user waits today.

We’ll identify one predictable human dependency, move it into the existing wait window and measure whether the workflow needs fewer stop-and-ask cycles.

Discuss a pilot →